The Power of Article 21: Doctrines and Maxims with Landmark Cases
In this blog we are trying to explain Doctrines and Maxims under Article 21 ,These principles collectively illustrate how Article 21 has been expansively interpreted by the Indian judiciary to encompass not just physical existence but also dignity, environmental quality, and justice.
Doctrines And Maxims Under Article 21
Nemopunitur pro alieno delicto (“No one gets punished for another’s crime”) – Maxims Under article 21
This one’s about fairness. Article 21 ensures your life or freedom isn’t taken away for something someone else did. It’s a shield against unjust blame.
Case : Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (1979)
- This one’s a classic. Thousands of undertrial prisoners were rotting in jail for years, some for longer than the maximum sentence they could’ve gotten. The Supreme Court stepped in, saying Article 21 guarantees fairness—punishing someone through endless detention for crimes they might not have committed (or for others’ delays) doesn’t fly. It’s not their fault the system’s slow, so they shouldn’t pay the price.
Ubi jus ibi remedium (“A right comes with a remedy”) -Maxims Under 21 Article
If your rights under Article 21 are messed with, the law’s got your back. It’s a guarantee that you’re not left hanging when things go wrong.
Case: Rudul Sah v. State of Bihar (1983)
- Rudul Sah was locked up for 14 years after being acquitted—talk about a system failure. The Supreme Court said Article 21 isn’t just words; if your liberty’s trashed, you get compensation. They awarded him damages right then and there, proving that when your rights are violated, the law has to make it right.
Doctrine of Rarest of the Rare -Doctrine Under Article 21
Death penalty? Only for the worst of the worst. Article 21 protects life, so the courts save this punishment for cases that truly shake society to its core.
Case: Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980)
- This is the death penalty case. The Supreme Court ruled that Article 21 protects life, so capital punishment is only for the “rarest of rare” cases—think brutal, society-shocking crimes where no other punishment fits. They upheld it but set a crazy high bar, balancing life’s sanctity with justice.
- Follow-up: Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983) refined it further, giving factors like motive and brutality to decide what’s “rare.”
Doctrine of Public Trust – Doctrine under article 21
Air, water, forests—these aren’t for private hoarding. Article 21 says they’re for everyone, held in trust by the state, because a good life depends on them.
Case: M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997)A fancy hotel tried to grab land near the Beas River, messing with its flow. The Supreme Court shut it down, saying natural resources like rivers are public trust under Article 21. The state’s job is to protect them for everyone, not let private players hog them for profit. Clean environment, good life—linked tight.
Precautionary Principle – Principle Under Article 21
This is the state stepping up. Under Article 21, they’ve got to spot environmental trouble early and stop it before it ruins lives.
Case: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996)Tanneries in Tamil Nadu were dumping waste, poisoning water and land. The Supreme Court said Article 21 includes the right to a healthy environment, so the state has to act before the damage is irreversible. They ordered preventive measures and shut down offenders, putting precaution front and center.
Polluter Pays Principle – Principle Under Article 21
Mess up the environment? You pay to fix it. Article 21 ties this to the right to a clean, healthy world—polluters don’t get a free pass.
Case :- Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (1996)
Chemical plants in Rajasthan wrecked soil and water with toxic sludge. The Supreme Court tied this to Article 21, saying if you pollute, you pay to clean it up—full stop. The companies had to cough up for remediation, ensuring people’s right to a clean world wasn’t just talk.
Conclusion – On – Doctrines and Maxims Under Article 21
We Hope You Now understand about Doctrines and Maxims Under Article 21 and in coming article we will explain more about Various Doctrine and Maxims .
